January 19, 2016
Why we buy
For a lot of folks, shopping is more than just buying something you need. It actually improves your mood.
“Picks me up when I’m down,” shopper Leslie Martin told Consumer Wise host Angie Moreschi.
Psychologist Dr. Harold Shinitzky, who is he author of several books on behavior, says there’s a reason you feel that way.
“When someone goes shopping there’s this wonderful release of endorphins and dopamine,” Dr. Shinitzky said. “It just feels good!”
Retailer Tricks to Increasing Buying
Retailers know this and spend billions to figure out how to maximize your experience so you’ll buy more, for example, the layout of a store.
“Where the more desired products are on the far side of the store, so you have to see distracting things, that might increase your probability of purchasing,” Shinitzky said.
Online search tools like Google track you and create pop-up ads to fit your interests.
“It’s kind of big brotherish, but that’s where the money’s made these days,” shopper Eric Long said.
“I think it’s annoying and I think it’s an invasion of privacy,” another shopper, Cassandra Earle, said.
Appeal to Your Senses
Another thing retailers do to entice you to buy more is appeal to your senses.
At a grocery store, for example, when you walk into the fruits and vegetables section, there is high intensity lighting to make the products shine more. And they spray water on them to make them glisten, so they look more appealing. Then, you might notice you’re funneled through the flowers section and bakery, both of which create lovely scents to tempt you.
“All of this is to draw you in for your senses, all five of your senses; and the more they can stimulate, the more likely you are to feel good about the environment and purchase more,” said Dr. Shinitzky.
Smart Phone Tracks Buying Habits
More and more the tool of choice for tracking your buying habits is your smart phone. Location services and all those apps you download give retailers a window into how you shop. Besides what deals you click on, it also can tell researchers how long you linger in a certain location. The longer the so-called “dwell time’ as they call it, the more you tend to buy.
“When someone passes 40 minutes of spending time shopping, that’s the point where we start seeing 50% of all of their impulse purchasing,” Dr. Shinitzky said.
Shopping can become addictive, so be on-guard for warning signs.
“Purchasing things you don’t need, didn’t want, can’t afford… you need to really take a hard look at your decision making,” Dr. Shinitzky said.
Take this insight into why you buy and how retailers try to get you to buy more and use it to empower yourself, so you can avoid impulse buying and buyer’s remorse.
*Angie Moreschi is the Consumer Wise Reporter for Bay News 9 in Tampa and News 13 in Orlando*
January 12, 2016
A new year is here and that means it’s time to get your financial future in order. Here are the top money mistakes to avoid in 2016.
Number 1: Don’t fail to have a plan.
“If you don’t have a goal, you’re gonna end up somewhere. It’s not maybe where you want to be,” certified financial planner Chris Redhead says.
December 16, 2014
Our pets are part of the family and we all want the best care for them, but vet care can get very expensive these days. Pet insurance is an option some pet owners consider to help ease the financial burden in case of an emergency or major illness, but does it pay off over time?
March 11, 2014
By Angie Moreschi
Credit monitoring is one of those things that you probably don’t think much about until something bad happens. Well, bad things have been happening. Ever since a few big security breaches at major retailers like Target, Neiman Marcus and Michaels Craft Store this year, a lot of us are suddenly thinking about it.
Jillian Estes is among the millions of target shoppers whose private information was compromised in the recent, major security breach. She knows every time she uses her credit card, there’s some risk, but actually finding out your information has been stolen, takes it to a whole new level. “There’s an obvious sense of violation, because that’s our money. That’s our account. How far does this go? Really, how deep is this? And we had to do something,” Estes said.
January 2, 2014
Our favorite economic prognosticator consulted his Magic 8 Ball to provide what is sure to be an accurate assessment of the year ahead. Al Lewis, who pens the Tell It to Al business news blogs and a weekly column for the Wall Street Journal, is always good for a few laughs– and maybe a few tears, as we look ahead to what 2014 has in store for our checkbooks.
Take it away Al:
If there’s one thing I’ve learned in all these years of covering business, it’s that nobody knows the future any better than the Magic 8 Ball by Mattel.
At the end of each year, I consult with my little black globe to see what the next year will bring for the economy.
For 2013, it accurately predicted: new highs for the stock market but a bumpy year for the economy; oil prices below $100 a barrel for most of the year; gold prices not returning to their 2011 high; and an unimpressive recovery for housing.
Click here to see what it forecasts for 2014 in my column in The Wall Street Journal Sunday.
January 2, 2014
Every year, Consumer Reports tests cars on its own track to come up with the best of the year and the worst.
Here is the list of duds as rated by Consumer Reports:
1. Chevrolet Spark CVT
2. Honda Crosstour
3. Lexus IS 250
4. Lincoln MKS
5. Mercedes-Benz CLA
6. Mitsubishi Mirage
7. Mitsubishi Outlander
8. Nissan Sentra
9. Nissan Versa sedan
10. Scion tC
Click here to read more about each car on ConsumerReports.org.
November 6, 2013
Popular herbal supplements like echinacea, Ginko biloba, St. John’s Wart, and black cohosh are among dozens being called into question, in a new study that used DNA testing. The study found many of these supplements don’t actually contain the herbs, at all. Instead, they are little more than powdered rice and weeds.
Canadian researchers tested 44 bottles of popular herbal supplements sold by 12 companies. A third of the pills actually contained none of the purported herb and 60-percent were diluted.
The New York Times reports on the controversy:
Americans spend an estimated $5 billion a year on unproven herbal supplements that promise everything from fighting off colds to curbing hot flashes and boosting memory. But now there is a new reason for supplement buyers to beware: DNA tests show that many pills labeled as healing herbs are little more than powdered rice and weeds.
Using a test called DNA barcoding, a kind of genetic fingerprinting that has also been used to help uncover labeling fraud in the commercial seafood industry, Canadian researchers tested 44 bottles of popular supplements sold by 12 companies. They found that many were not what they claimed to be, and that pills labeled as popular herbs were often diluted — or replaced entirely — by cheap fillers like soybean, wheat and rice.
Click here to read more from the New York Times.
June 25, 2013
When you look at a generic product on the shelf, is there a little voice in the back of your head that says, ‘It must be a little bit inferior to the name brand‘? That’s certainly what the name brands would like you to think, since they spend tons of money to get you to pick their product, but generally research shows most generics are almost identical to many name brands. And, of course, they cost a lot less.
So, who among us is smart enough to realize that and resist the urge to go for the well-advertised product, instead reaching for that blandly packaged generic? According to a new study of shopping data by Nielson Co. people who work as nurses and chefs are among those who most often save the bucks and chose the generic.
Education appears to be a factor in choosing generics. People who’ve gone to college are more likely to pick generic headache remedies than those who don’t. The Wall Street Journal took an intriguing look at the new research. You can read more here.
May 30, 2013
It’s common practice for drug companies to compensate doctors as promotional speakers and advisers. The income some get can be quite substantial, creating potential conflicts of interest. Critics worry that such substantial compensation can affect a doctor’s judgement on which drugs might be best for their patients.
The non-profit News Outlet ProPublica publishes an annual database that compiles payments from 15 pharmaceutical companies to doctors around the country. So far, more than $2 billion dollars in payments are accounted for since 2009. The Dollars for Docs database makes it very easy for you to search and find out if your doctor is receiving money from pharmaceutical companies.
Among the drug companies that gave the most from 2009 to 2012 were Pfizer at $538.2 million, GlaxoSmithKline at $238.6 million, and Merck at $224.3 million. Doctors from all over the country are recipients of drug company compensation, but the top earners were from just a handful of states– New York, Texas, California, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania and Tennessee.
Is your doctor on the list? Click here to find out.
April 29, 2013
Could an all expenses paid fishing trip or dinner at a five star restaurant influence your doctor when it comes to which prescription to give you? It’s a serious concern which is the focus of attention again because the US Attorney in Manhattan filed suit against drug maker Novartis for allegedly paying kickbacks to increase its prescription-drug sales.
A whistleblower first brought the case to light and now the federal government is putting its power behind the allegations with the filing of this federal lawsuit. The Switzerland based drug-maker is accused of violating the Anti-Kickback Statute to increase sales of two hypertension drugs, Lotrel and Valturna. US Attorney in the Southern District of New York, Preet Bharara said in a statement, “Novartis reaped dramatically increased profits on these drugs, and Medicare, Medicaid and other federal health-care programs were left holding the bag.”
This suit against Novartis comes just days after the same US attorney’s office filed suit against the company for another alleged violation of the False Claims Act. That suit claims Novartis paid kickbacks, disguised as rebates and discounts, to at least 20 pharmacies for switching patients to its drug Myfortic, which is an immuno-suppressant.
It’s not the first time Novartis has faced such allegations. Just three years ago, the company settled criminal and civil charges that it illegally promoted drugs for off-label uses. Once again, the company was accused of providing illegal kickbacks to doctors through special junkets and entertainment. Novartis paid $422.5 million to settle that case and signed a corporate integrity agreement to promise that its promotions would comply with federal anti-kickback laws.
Returning Money to Taxpayers
When whistleblowers working for pharmaceutical companies come forward to report suspected violations of these anti-kickback laws, it lays the groundwork for the government to recover what often amounts to millions of dollars in improper Medicare and Medicaid payments. That means money returned to the taxpayers.
Novartis denies wrongdoing in both of these most recent cases and vows to defend itself in court.